Skip to main content

Free the Female Nipple


Why are women’s nipples, specifically, so taboo? Why are people so shocked by women’s nipples? Why do they have so much power?

Men have them. Women have them. We all demand equality and want to be treated equally, yet women are still vilified for 'indecent exposure' for showing something that both parties naturally have. Why only women? As if the public is simply too delicate to handle seeing female nipples. When did a nipple become offensive? Where do you draw the line at 'indecent'?



What is it about women’s nipples that can stir so much interest in today’s society? They are, after all, a normal part of all women regardless of race, ethnicity or religion.

I’m trying my best to understand why society looks upon women’s nipples as offensive. I understand the whole religious morality issue – even though, as an Atheist, I don’t agree with it. Women were taught since early childhood that displaying their nipples openly is offensive, slutty, and completely against societal morals. This belief system dates back thousands of years.



I do believe this belief will never change. Yes, we have become a more openly accepting society, but at its core, men will always view women who display their nipples as sluts, or somehow starving for attention. 

What really boggles my mind is how men’s nipples are perfectly acceptable to display openly and yet women’s nipples are not. It is also acceptable to display women’s breasts as long as the nipple area is covered. Now, who the heck implemented these standards? They can display the under-boob and the cleavage, but if that nipple area shows – don’t even think about it! And what about those 'micro' bikinis which pretty much show off the whole boob, and just cover the nipple?



We are constantly seeing nip-slips primarily from celebrities, whom I believe, do this on purpose. I want to understand why women have a different set of rules. I can’t seem to wrap my head around the fact that it’s ok for men, and not for women. There’s a double standard and it’s time to change that.

Female nipples have been neatly wiped from mainstream media. Even today – in 2018 -- we’re still censoring women’s nipples. Why can’t women show their nipples, but Putin can?!



I have a hard time understanding the message we’re sending when we delete such a beautiful part of a woman’s body. Nipples are harmless, but deliberately removing them from existence makes us think otherwise.

What I am arguing for is a woman’s right to choose how she represents her body — and to make that choice based on personal desire, and not a fear of how people will react to her or how society will judge her. This is not simply about nipples. It’s about equality. It’s about having that choice.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

35 European Countries & their most recognizable artworks

We all love art, and we all love Europe, so I hope you'll enjoy the following list.

01. Austria - The Kiss, Gustav Klimt, 1908.


02. Belarus - The Fiddler, Marc Chagall, 1913.

03. Belgium - The Son of Man, René Magritte, 1964.
04. Bosnia & Herzegovina - Mountain Landscape, Karlo Mijić, 1924.
05. Bulgaria - Rachenitsa Dance, Ivan Mrkvička, 1894.
06. Croatia - Roman Woman Playing A Lute, Vjekoslav Karas, 1845-47.
07. Cyprus - Cyclist in a Landscape, Stelios Votsis, 2005.
08. Czech Republic - The Absinthe Drinker, Viktor Oliva, 1901.
09. Denmark - The Little Mermaid, Edvard Eriksen, 1913.
10. Estonia - Half Nude in Striped Skirt, Adamson-Eric, Year Unknown.
11. France - Impression Sunrise, Claude Mon

No Fate and No Destiny

Last night, I was sipping some drinks with a couple of friends at Castille Square. We were using the outdoor tables and chairs of The Beer Cave. I was having Amaretto. I love Amaretto. One of my two friends was having Black Label, and the other one was having Gin & Tonic. It was around 2 a.m. when the Gin & Tonic girl said something about fate and destiny to which I immediately replied that I don’t believe in such things. That single comment sparked a very long and exhausting debate.

One of the greatest and everlasting debates of humanity has been about the role of destiny in the lives of human beings. There was a time when it was almost an accepted fact of life, that each and every event was governed by destiny. Astrology was considered a science. Then with the advent of modern times, the importance of the role of destiny as a concept started losing weight. Today, belief in destiny is considered a superstition by the majority of people. And rightly so, since there seems to be …

The Prince And The Pauper

It seems that many in Malta and around the world are awaiting with bated breath the arrival of a new British royal this month. Kensington Palace officials did not reveal Kate’s exact due date, but it has been reported to be 23rd April. This info is all over the news… But I don’t care about the royal baby much! The fact that this particular baby will be born doesn’t excite me at all. Is there anything  wrong with me? I can’t help but wonder about the estimated 371,520 babies that will be born around the world on the same day that, the third royal baby will come to be. While  some of those common children will also be born into a world of relative privilege and safety—though not the royal levels of privilege, by any means—many more of them will not. Many of the babies born on the 23rd April will inherit a world that is dangerous and even deadly. Of the non-royal 371,520 babies that will be born on the 23rd April, it is estimated that 24,000 will probably not live to see their fifth birthd…