Skip to main content

Free the Female Nipple


Why are women’s nipples, specifically, so taboo? Why are people so shocked by women’s nipples? Why do they have so much power?

Men have them. Women have them. We all demand equality and want to be treated equally, yet women are still vilified for 'indecent exposure' for showing something that both parties naturally have. Why only women? As if the public is simply too delicate to handle seeing female nipples. When did a nipple become offensive? Where do you draw the line at 'indecent'?



What is it about women’s nipples that can stir so much interest in today’s society? They are, after all, a normal part of all women regardless of race, ethnicity or religion.

I’m trying my best to understand why society looks upon women’s nipples as offensive. I understand the whole religious morality issue – even though, as an Atheist, I don’t agree with it. Women were taught since early childhood that displaying their nipples openly is offensive, slutty, and completely against societal morals. This belief system dates back thousands of years.



I do believe this belief will never change. Yes, we have become a more openly accepting society, but at its core, men will always view women who display their nipples as sluts, or somehow starving for attention. 

What really boggles my mind is how men’s nipples are perfectly acceptable to display openly and yet women’s nipples are not. It is also acceptable to display women’s breasts as long as the nipple area is covered. Now, who the heck implemented these standards? They can display the under-boob and the cleavage, but if that nipple area shows – don’t even think about it! And what about those 'micro' bikinis which pretty much show off the whole boob, and just cover the nipple?



We are constantly seeing nip-slips primarily from celebrities, whom I believe, do this on purpose. I want to understand why women have a different set of rules. I can’t seem to wrap my head around the fact that it’s ok for men, and not for women. There’s a double standard and it’s time to change that.

Female nipples have been neatly wiped from mainstream media. Even today – in 2018 -- we’re still censoring women’s nipples. Why can’t women show their nipples, but Putin can?!



I have a hard time understanding the message we’re sending when we delete such a beautiful part of a woman’s body. Nipples are harmless, but deliberately removing them from existence makes us think otherwise.

What I am arguing for is a woman’s right to choose how she represents her body — and to make that choice based on personal desire, and not a fear of how people will react to her or how society will judge her. This is not simply about nipples. It’s about equality. It’s about having that choice.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Top 7 Strange Sculptures in Europe

Among the many traditional monuments and statues we can find around Europe, there are those whose sculptors appear to have departed completely from tradition. I picked out a few of the most interesting, surprising and strange ones I could find. 1. Monument to a woman’s handbag - Cuneo, Italy
A women's handbag is a very important wardrobe item. Psychologists say that by the handbag you can determine the nature and hobbies of a woman. 
The most famous monument to a women's handbag is in Cuneo, Italy.
2. Monument to the Unknown Bureaucrat - Reykjavik, Iceland
Several countries have monuments to the Unknown Soldier, but perhaps only Iceland has a sculpture honoring the job of the bureaucrat. 
This 1994 sculpture by Magnús Tómasson depicts a man in a suit holding a briefcase, with his head and shoulders subsumed in a slab of unsculpted stone.
3. Untitled 1986 (The Headington Shark) - Oxford, England
Untitled 1986 is a rooftop sculpture located at 2, New High Street, Headington, Oxford, En…

Being Busy is a Disease

I’ll admit it. When someone asks me how I’m doing, the first word that usually comes out of my mouth is – Busy. Usually preceded by a big, overly dramatic sigh.And I’m definitely not alone.If you live in Malta in the 21st century you’ve probably had to listen to a lot of people tell you how busy they are. It has become the automatic response to when you ask anyone how they’re doing: “Busy.” “So busy.” “Crazy busy.” It is, pretty obviously, a boast disguised as a complaint. And the usual response is a kind of congratulation: “That’s a good problem to have.” or “Better than the opposite.
Almost everyone I know is busy. They feel anxious and guilty when they aren’t either working, or doing something to promote their work. I recently wrote a friend to ask if he wanted to do something this week, and he answered that he didn’t have a lot of time, but if something was going on to let him know and maybe he could get rid of work for a few hours.
This made me think about how we glorify being bus…

The Prince And The Pauper

It seems that many in Malta and around the world are awaiting with bated breath the arrival of a new British royal this month. Kensington Palace officials did not reveal Kate’s exact due date, but it has been reported to be 23rd April. This info is all over the news… But I don’t care about the royal baby much! The fact that this particular baby will be born doesn’t excite me at all. Is there anything  wrong with me? I can’t help but wonder about the estimated 371,520 babies that will be born around the world on the same day that, the third royal baby will come to be. While  some of those common children will also be born into a world of relative privilege and safety—though not the royal levels of privilege, by any means—many more of them will not. Many of the babies born on the 23rd April will inherit a world that is dangerous and even deadly. Of the non-royal 371,520 babies that will be born on the 23rd April, it is estimated that 24,000 will probably not live to see their fifth birthd…